Saturday, March 18, 2006

大话《曹操》

《曹操》——林俊杰

不是英雄 不读三国
若是英雄 怎么能不懂寂寞
独自走下长坂坡
月光太温柔 曹操不啰嗦
一心要拿荆州
用阴谋 阳谋 明说 暗夺的摸

东汉末年分三国
烽火连天不休
儿女情长 被乱世左右
谁来煮酒

尔虞我诈是三国
说不清对与错
纷纷扰扰 千百年以后
一切又从头




最近一直在MP3播放这首歌。虽然觉得它对曹操这个历史人物的刻画并不够深入,但流行歌曲能够加入历史和文学的元素,我认为已是难得。

特别喜欢这几句:

*“若是英雄 怎么能不懂寂寞”
——李白的诗中也说过:古来圣贤皆寂寞。虽然曹操非圣贤,只能算是枭雄,但这种属于英雄/枭雄/圣贤的孤独感,未尝不能以“高处不胜寒”来加以解释。


*“儿女情长 被乱世左右 谁来煮酒”
——在乱世,儿女私情是比不上天下大事的。《三国》的重点虽然是对战事的描写,但其中还是有“儿女情长”的,如对刘备和周瑜等都有感情的描写。当然处在乱世,要牺牲的还是感情。

*“尔虞我诈是三国 说不清对与错”
——“兵不厌诈”,《三国》中当然处处有人使诈,从曹操到诸葛亮到周瑜,各个都是使诈高手。但在当时的烽火年代,我们能够分辨到底是谁对谁错吗?

* “纷纷扰扰 千百年以后 一切又重头”
——“话说天下大势,分久必合,合久必分”。这是《三国演义第一回中的第一句。“分旧必合,合久必分”是中国历代朝代历史的现象概括。我的感触是:即使统一了天下,又怎么样呢?待千百年以后,统一的又可能是四分五裂了。



当然作为“纪老师”,我还是要以这首歌做教材。《三国》中的内容:

*地名——“长坂坡”、“荆州”

*三国时代——“东汉末年”

*经典内容——“谁来煮酒” - 第二十一回中,曹操煮酒论英雄。

*中国古代历朝的现象概括——“纷纷扰扰 千百年以后 一切又重头” - 天下大势,分久必合,合久必分 => 试想想:哪一朝代是没有战乱,然后统一,然后再战乱,再统一的。

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Some GOOD news on Mon

1) Lee Ang won the Achievement in Directing for 78th Academy Awards.
He is the first Asian (and Chinese) to win this award!
2) My crash course student, YY got C6 for his O-level Chinese Language.
I thought he didn't make it cos I haven't heard from him since the release of the results. It was truly encouraging to hear that he made it from Ms Chiu through sms in the evening. I am really happy for him. Hope that he can pursue what he has always wanted to do in polytechnic.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Congrats NTUCO!

Ticket count on Thursday (2 Mar) was far from excellent with slightly over 50% ticket sales. This was disheartening for both members and Huang Lao Shi, I guessed. I was thinking of sending more messages to my friends after hearing this.

However on the actual day of the concert (4 Mar), the president broke the news that we had a sold-out concert and they were planning to open the limited seats on the second level. WOW! This was really the few occasions that I see full-house concert.

Sibing and I backstage

Peicong and Sibing (cute pose, isn't it?)

Weicong and I (a photo to see who's taller : D )

Yan Shuang backstage, busy practising

Wenyi backstage, busy practising too

Michelle backstage, focusing on her music (see how serious she is?)

Congrats NTUCO! I think we have made great improved compared to the one last year. The ticket sales was a morale booster. I wonder if Huang Lao Shi would be adventurous enough to try Ga Da Mei Lin next year.

Thank you, IKEA!

Despite having to wake up very early when there is no school on Fri, we were really excited and nervous about our interview with the Managing Director of IKEA, Mr Tom Huzell. The interview was scheduled to be at 9am. It was extremely surprising to see this welcome note on their large blackboard just next to their reception counter.

See, we were called "friends" and not "students" or anything else.

Mr Huzell was slightly late but he was warm and friendly, offering the four of us firm handshakes and introduced himself as "Tom". He was down-to earth in his short-sleeve shirt. Not the kind of straight-faced boss with the I-am-your-boss kind of look. He is part of the Fortune 100 management, mind you.

The interview went on smoothly. Mr Huzell was very willing to part with IKEA's franchising concept, not-available-on-the website kind of information and entertained lots of our nitty-gritty enquiries that only business students will be interested to know. We were like some acqauintances having a discussion in his office. He was humourous too, peppering his answer with witty remarks. Unfortunately, I cannot divulge any of these here. He even took the trouble to show us to the door.


From left: Yong Ming, Weijing, Mr Huzell, Gloria and me

Not every company and top level management feels the need to entertain such request from business students who are likely to ask theoretical and sometimes, stupid questions for those in the real business world. They are neglecting the fact that by allowing undergraduates to write about them, they are in fact allowing us to introduce them to the class in a very professional and positive manner. This is actually free publicity to potential future customers, creating awareness among them. Most importantly, students doing the interview or studies about the companies will most probably feel some emotional attachment to the company and feel the need to reciprocate in whatever manner they deemed appropriate. (see this, the company with the big M?)

This is a indeed a wonderful and unforgettable experience. Mr Huzell is very kind to offer this opportunity to us and is generous with the impart of information. He could have just get his marketing or business development manager to talk to us. Worse still, he could have requested to do an email interview instead. But he chose to see us face-to-face and tried his best to provide us with whatever information we need.

Thank you IKEA! Thank you, Mr Huzell!

Big corporations and their no-reply attitude

Nobody cares about 6 marketing students who were to hand in a summary for their featured company in less-than-a-week time.


We were really desparate, even thinking of how to choose a company from the Fortune 100 and 500 Largest list of companies that no one will bother doing. In this way, we can get around the requirement of having to interview the company to gather information about their channel management.


McDonald's replied:

Dear Ms Sharon Kee,

Thank you for your email.
McDonald's Singapore is wholly owned by McDonald's Corporation in the US.
You might like to visit www.mcdonalds.com, where there's a section on franchising.
All the best in your project.



What a good suggestion. If we could get whatever information we need on the website, we would not be bothered to ask for a interview.


After sending out couple of dozens of emails to other companies, we were on the verge of giving up. As the deadline of the project summary drew near, we panicked.


Then our saviour comes after we managed to send an email to the Michelle, the Personal Assistant of the Managing Director of IKEA. She helped us to secure an interview with the MD and was really prompt with her replies.


Thank you, Michelle! I feel that we have not thank you enough.